Quantifying the contribution of recessive coding variation to developmental disorders
Hilary C Martin,
Wendy D Jones,
Jeremy F McRae,
Diana S. Johnson,
Sally Ann Lynch,
Sarju G. Mehta,
Michael J Parker,
Peter D. Turnpenny,
Pradeep C. Vasudevan,
Caroline F Wright,
David R. FitzPatrick,
Helen V Firth,
Matthew E Hurles,
Jeffrey C Barrett,
on behalf of the DDD Study
Posted 13 Oct 2017
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/201533 (published DOI: 10.1126/science.aar6731)
Posted 13 Oct 2017
Large exome-sequencing datasets offer an unprecedented opportunity to understand the genetic architecture of rare diseases, informing clinical genetics counseling and optimal study designs for disease gene identification. We analyzed 7,448 exome-sequenced families from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study, and, for the first time, estimated the causal contribution of recessive coding variation exome-wide. We found that the proportion of cases attributable to recessive coding variants is surprisingly low in patients of European ancestry, at only 3.6%, versus 50% of cases explained by de novo coding mutations. Surprisingly, we found that, even in European probands with affected siblings, recessive coding variants are only likely to explain ~12% of cases. In contrast, they account for 31% of probands with Pakistani ancestry due to elevated autozygosity. We tested every gene for an excess of damaging homozygous or compound heterozygous genotypes and found three genes that passed stringent Bonferroni correction: EIF3F, KDM5B, and THOC6. EIF3F is a novel disease gene, and KDM5B has previously been reported as a dominant disease gene. KDM5B appears to follow a complex mode of inheritance, in which heterozygous loss-of-function variants (LoFs) show incomplete penetrance and biallelic LoFs are fully penetrant. Our results suggest that a large proportion of undiagnosed developmental disorders remain to be explained by other factors, such as noncoding variants and polygenic risk.
- Downloaded 1,864 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 7,329
- In genetics: 359
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 55,891
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 75,889
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!