A Minimally Destructive Protocol for DNA Extraction from Ancient Teeth
By
Éadaoin Harney,
Olivia Cheronet,
Daniel M. Fernandes,
Kendra Sirak,
Matthew Mah,
Rebecca Bernardos,
Nicole Adamski,
Nasreen Broomandkhoshbacht,
Kimberly Callan,
Ann Marie Lawson,
Jonas Oppenheimer,
Kristin Stewardson,
Fatma Zalzala,
Alexandra Anders,
Francesca Candilio,
Mihai Constantinescu,
Alfredo Coppa,
Ion Ciobanu,
János Dani,
Zsolt Gallina,
Francesco Genchi,
Emese Gyöngyvér Nagy,
Tamás Hajdu,
Magdolna Hellebrandt,
Antónia Horváth,
Ágnes Király,
Krisztián Kiss,
Barbara Kolozsi,
Péter Kovács,
Kitti Köhler,
Michaela Lucci,
Ildikó Pap,
Sergiu Popovici,
Pál Raczky,
Angela Simalcsik,
Tamás Szeniczey,
Sergey Vasilyev,
Cristian Virag,
Nadin Rohland,
David E. Reich,
Ron Pinhasi
Posted 19 Aug 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.19.256412
Ancient DNA sampling methods--although optimized for efficient DNA extraction--are destructive, relying on drilling or cutting and powdering (parts of) bones and teeth. As the field of ancient DNA has grown, so have concerns about the impact of destructive sampling of the skeletal remains from which ancient DNA is obtained. Due to a particularly high concentration of endogenous DNA, the cementum of tooth roots is often targeted for ancient DNA sampling, but standard destructive sampling methods often result in the loss of at least one entire root. Here, we present a minimally destructive method for extracting ancient DNA from dental cementum present on the surface of tooth roots. This method does not require destructive drilling or grinding, and, following extraction, the tooth remains safe to handle and suitable for most morphological studies, as well as other biochemical studies, such as radiocarbon dating. We extracted and sequenced ancient DNA from 30 teeth (and 9 corresponding petrous bones) using this minimally destructive extraction method in addition to a typical tooth sampling method. We find that the minimally destructive method can provide ancient DNA that is of comparable quality to extracts produced from teeth that have undergone destructive sampling processes. Further, we find that a rigorous cleaning of the tooth surface combining diluted bleach and UV light irradiation seems sufficient to minimize external contaminants usually removed through the physical removal of a superficial layer when sampling through regular powdering methods. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
Download data
- Downloaded 806 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 26,453
- In evolutionary biology: 1,277
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 3,558
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 3,558
Altmetric data
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
PanLingua
News
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!