Reconciling functional differences in populations of neurons recorded with two-photon imaging and electrophysiology
Joshua H Siegle,
Gabriel Koch Ocker,
Daniel J Denman,
Philip R Nicovich,
Kat R North,
Tamina K Ramirez,
Shawn R Olsen,
Michael A. Buice,
Saskia E. J. de Vries
Posted 11 Aug 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.10.244723
Posted 11 Aug 2020
Extracellular electrophysiology and two-photon calcium imaging are widely used methods for measuring physiological activity with single cell resolution across large populations of neurons in the brain. While these two modalities have distinct advantages and disadvantages, neither provides complete, unbiased information about the underlying neural population. Here, we compare evoked responses in visual cortex recorded in awake mice under highly standardized conditions using either imaging or electrophysiology. Across all stimulus conditions tested, we observe a larger fraction of responsive neurons in electrophysiology and higher stimulus selectivity in calcium imaging. This work explores which data transformations are most useful for explaining these modality specific discrepancies. We show that the higher selectivity in imaging can be partially reconciled by applying a spikes-to-calcium forward model to the electrophysiology data. However, the forward model could not reconcile differences in responsiveness without sub selecting neurons based on event rate or level of signal contamination. This suggests that differences in responsiveness more likely reflect neuronal sampling bias or cluster merging artifacts during spike sorting of electrophysiological recordings, rather than flaws in event detection from fluorescence time series. This work establishes the dominant impacts of the two modalities' respective biases on a set of functional metrics that are fundamental for characterizing sensory-evoked responses. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
- Downloaded 1,145 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 17,131
- In neuroscience: 2,124
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 10,649
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 13,454
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!