Genetic data and cognitively-defined late-onset Alzheimer's disease subgroups
Andrew J Saykin,
Laura E Gibbons,
David W Fardo,
Alden L Gross,
Diana K.N. Louden,
R. Elizabeth Sanders,
Thomas J Grabowski,
Thomas D Bird,
Susan M McCurry,
Beth E Snitz,
M. Ilyas Kamboh,
Oscar L. Lopez,
Philip L. De Jager,
David A. Bennett,
C. Dirk Keene,
Eric B Larson,
Paul K Crane
Posted 11 Jul 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/367615 (published DOI: 10.1038/s41380-018-0298-8)
Posted 11 Jul 2018
Categorizing people with late-onset Alzheimer's disease into biologically coherent subgroups is important for personalized medicine. We evaluated data from five studies (total n=4,050, of whom 2,431 had genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data). We assigned people to cognitively-defined subgroups on the basis of relative performance in memory, executive functioning, visuospatial functioning, and language at the time of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. We compared genotype frequencies for each subgroup to those from cognitively normal elderly controls. We focused on APOE and on SNPs with p<1e-5 and odds ratios more extreme than those previously reported for Alzheimer's disease (<0.77 or >1.30). There was substantial variation across studies in the proportions of people in each subgroup. In each study, higher proportions of people with isolated substantial relative memory impairment had ≥1 APOE ε4 allele than any other subgroup (overall p= 1.5e-27). Across subgroups, there were 33 novel suggestive loci across the genome with p<1e-5 and an extreme OR compared to controls, of which none had statistical evidence of heterogeneity and 30 had ORs in the same direction across all datasets. These data support the biological coherence of cognitively-defined subgroups and nominate novel genetic loci.
- Downloaded 554 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 29,769 out of 100,263
- In genetics: 1,773 out of 4,997
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 79,756 out of 100,263
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: None out of 100,263
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 20 Oct 2020: Support for sorting preprints using Twitter activity has been removed, at least temporarily, until a new source of social media activity data becomes available.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!