Rxivist logo

LD Score Regression Distinguishes Confounding from Polygenicity in Genome-Wide Association Studies

By Brendan K. Bulik-Sullivan, Po-Ru Loh, Hilary Finucane, Stephan Ripke, Jian Yang, Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Nick Patterson, Mark J. Daly, Alkes L. Price, Benjamin Neale

Posted 21 Feb 2014
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/002931 (published DOI: 10.1038/ng.3211)

Both polygenicity (i.e. many small genetic effects) and confounding biases, such as cryptic relatedness and population stratification, can yield inflated distributions of test statistics in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, current methods cannot distinguish between inflation from bias and true signal from polygenicity. We have developed an approach that quantifies the contributions of each by examining the relationship between test statistics and linkage disequilibrium (LD). We term this approach LD Score regression. LD Score regression provides an upper bound on the contribution of confounding bias to the observed inflation in test statistics and can be used to estimate a more powerful correction factor than genomic control. We find strong evidence that polygenicity accounts for the majority of test statistic inflation in many GWAS of large sample size.

Download data

  • Downloaded 7,052 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 435 out of 92,034
    • In genomics: 91 out of 5,809
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 46,645 out of 92,034
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 48,167 out of 92,034

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide


Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)