Assessing the measurement transfer function of single-cell RNA sequencing
Hannah R. Dueck,
Oleg V Evgrafov,
Stephen A Fisher,
Jennifer S. Hernstein,
Tae Kyung Kim,
Jae Mun (Hugo) Kim,
William J. Mack,
Chris P. Walker,
Robert H Chow,
James A. Knowles,
Posted 24 Mar 2016
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/045450
Posted 24 Mar 2016
Recently, measurement of RNA at single cell resolution has yielded surprising insights. Methods for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have received considerable attention, but the broad reliability of single cell methods and the factors governing their performance are still poorly known. Here, we conducted a large-scale control experiment to assess the transfer function of three scRNA-seq methods and factors modulating the function. All three methods detected greater than 70% of the expected number of genes and had a 50% probability of detecting genes with abundance greater than 2 to 4 molecules. Despite the small number of molecules, sequencing depth significantly affected gene detection. While biases in detection and quantification were qualitatively similar across methods, the degree of bias differed, consistent with differences in molecular protocol. Measurement reliability increased with expression level for all methods and we conservatively estimate the measurement transfer functions to be linear above ~5-10 molecules. Based on these extensive control studies, we propose that RNA-seq of single cells has come of age, yielding quantitative biological information.
- Downloaded 1,035 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 8,809 out of 77,108
- In genomics: 1,348 out of 5,066
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 67,611 out of 77,108
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 71,014 out of 77,108
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!