Common maternal and fetal genetic variants show expected polygenic effects on the probability of being born small- or large-for-gestational-age (SGA or LGA), except in the smallest 3% of babies
Sarah J Kotecha,
Andrew R. Wood,
Bridget A. Knight,
Mark I. McCarthy,
Andrew T Hattersley,
Nicholas J. Timpson,
Rachel M Freathy,
Posted 25 Mar 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.25.005660
Posted 25 Mar 2020
Babies born clinically Small- or Large-for-Gestational-Age (SGA or LGA; sex- and gestational age-adjusted birth weight (BW) <10th or >90th percentile, respectively), are at higher risks of complications. SGA and LGA include babies who have experienced growth-restriction or overgrowth, respectively, and babies who are naturally small or large. However, the relative proportions within each group are unclear. We aimed to assess the extent to which the genetics of normal variation in birth weight influence the probability of SGA/LGA. We calculated independent fetal and maternal genetic scores (GS) for BW in 12,125 babies and 5,187 mothers. These scores capture the direct fetal and indirect maternal (via intrauterine environment) genetic contributions to BW, respectively. We also calculated maternal fasting glucose (FG) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) GS. We tested associations between each GS and probability of SGA or LGA. For the BW GS, we used simulations to assess evidence of deviation from an expected polygenic model. Higher BW GS were strongly associated with lower odds of SGA and higher odds of LGA (ORfetal=0.65 (0.60,0.71) and 1.47 (1.36,1.59); ORmaternal=0.80 (0.76,0.87) and 1.23 (1.15,1.31), respectively per 1 decile higher GS). Associations were in accordance with a polygenic model except in the smallest 3% of babies (Pfetal=0.0034, Pmaternal=0.023). Higher maternal GS for FG and SBP were associated with higher odds of LGA and SGA respectively (both P<0.01). While lower maternal FG and SBP are generally considered healthy in pregnancy, we found some evidence of association with higher odds of SGA (P=0.015) and LGA (P=0.14) respectively. We conclude that common genetic variants contribute to risk of SGA and LGA, but that additional factors become more important for risk of SGA in the smallest 3% of babies. Naturally low maternal glucose and blood pressure levels may additionally contribute to risk of SGA and LGA, respectively. Author Summary Babies in the lowest or highest 10% of the population distribution of birth weight (BW) for a given gestational age are referred to as Small- or Large-for-Gestational-Age (SGA or LGA) respectively. These babies have higher risks of complications compared to babies with BW closer to the mean. SGA and LGA babies may have experienced growth restriction or overgrowth, respectively, but may alternatively just be at the tail ends of the normal growth distribution. The relative proportions of normal vs. sub-optimal growth within these groups is unclear. To examine the role of common genetic variation in SGA and LGA, we tested their associations with a fetal genetic score (GS) for BW in 12,125 European-ancestry individuals. We also tested associations with maternal GS (5,187 mothers) for offspring BW, fasting glucose and systolic blood pressure, each of which influences fetal growth via the in utero environment. We found all fetal and maternal GS were associated with SGA and LGA, supporting strong maternal and fetal genetic contributions to birth weight in both tails of the distribution. However, within the smallest 3% of babies, the maternal and fetal GS for BW were higher than expected, suggesting factors additional to common genetic variation are more important in determining birth weight in these very small babies.
- Downloaded 144 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 112,703
- In genetics: 4,942
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 115,128
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 115,128
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!