Identifying Nootropic Drug Targets via Large-Scale Cognitive GWAS and Transcriptomics
W. David Hill,
Joey W. Trampush,
David C Liewald,
Astri J. Lundervold,
Vidar M. Steen,
Johan G. Eriksson,
Annette M. Hartmann,
Katherine E. Burdick,
Deborah K Koltai,
Anna C. Need,
Elizabeth T. Cirulli,
Aristotle N. Voineskos,
Nikos C. Stefanis,
Dimitrios G. Avramopoulos,
Robert M. Bilder,
Nelson A. Freimer,
Tyrone D. Cannon,
Russell A. Poldrack,
Fred W. Sabb,
Emily Drabant Conley,
Matthew A. Scult,
Richard E Straub,
Ahmad R Hariri,
Daniel R Weinberger,
Stephanie Le Hellard,
Matthew C. Keller,
Ole A. Andreassen,
David C Glahn,
Anil K. Malhotra,
Posted 06 Feb 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.06.934752 (published DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.08.141)
Posted 06 Feb 2020
Background: Cognitive traits demonstrate significant genetic correlations with many psychiatric disorders and other health-related traits, and many neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders are marked by cognitive deficits. Therefore, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of general cognitive ability might suggest potential targets for nootropic drug repurposing. Our previous effort to identify "druggable genes" (i.e., GWAS-identified genes that produce proteins targeted by known small molecules) was modestly powered due to the small cognitive GWAS sample available at the time. Since then, two large cognitive GWAS meta-analyses have reported 148 and 205 genome-wide significant loci, respectively. Additionally, large-scale gene expression databases, derived from post-mortem human brain, have recently been made available for GWAS annotation. Here, we 1) reconcile results from these two cognitive GWAS meta-analyses to further enhance power for locus discovery; 2) employ several complementary transcriptomic methods to identify genes in these loci with variants that are credibly associated with cognition, and 3) further annotate the resulting genes to identify "druggable" targets. Methods: GWAS summary statistics were harmonized and jointly analysed using Multi-Trait Analysis of GWAS [MTAG], which is optimized for handling sample overlaps. Downstream gene identification was carried out using MAGMA, S-PrediXcan/S-TissueXcan Transcriptomic Wide Analysis, and eQTL mapping, as well as more recently developed methods that integrate GWAS and eQTL data via Summary-statistics Mendelian Randomization [SMR] and linkage methods [HEIDI]. Available brain-specific eQTL databases included GTEXv7, BrainEAC, CommonMind, ROSMAP, and PsychENCODE. Intersecting credible genes were then annotated against multiple chemoinformatic databases [DGIdb, KI, and a published review on "druggability"]. Results: Using our meta-analytic data set (N = 373,617) we identified 241 independent cognition-associated loci (29 novel), and 76 genes were identified by 2 or more methods of gene identification. 26 genes were associated with general cognitive ability via SMR, 16 genes via STissueXcan/S-PrediXcan, 47 genes via eQTL mapping, and 68 genes via MAGMA pathway analysis. The use of the HEIDI test permitted the exclusion of candidate genes that may have been artifactually associated to cognition due to linkage, rather than direct causal or indirect pleiotropic effects. Actin and chromatin binding gene sets were identified as novel pathways that could be targeted via drug repurposing. Leveraging on our various transcriptome and pathway analyses, as well as available chemoinformatic databases, we identified 16 putative genes that may suggest drug targets with nootropic properties. Discussion: Results converged on several categories of significant drug targets, including serotonergic and glutamatergic genes, voltage-gated ion channel genes, carbonic anhydrase genes, and phosphodiesterase genes. The current results represent the first efforts to apply a multi-method approach to integrate gene expression and SNP level data to identify credible actionable genes for general cognitive ability.
- Downloaded 382 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 46,170 out of 100,306
- In genomics: 4,049 out of 6,221
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 9,020 out of 100,306
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: None out of 100,306
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 20 Oct 2020: Support for sorting preprints using Twitter activity has been removed, at least temporarily, until a new source of social media activity data becomes available.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!