Experience-dependent modulation of the visual evoked potential: testing effect sizes, retention over time, and associations with age in 415 healthy individuals
Nora B. Slapø,
Clara M.F. Timpe,
Linn Sofie Sæther,
Knut Andre Skaug,
Jan Egil Nordvik,
Gaute T. Einevoll,
Lars T. Westlye,
Erik G. Jönsson,
Ole A Andreassen,
Posted 28 Jan 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.27.916692
Posted 28 Jan 2020
Experience-dependent modulation of the visual evoked potential (VEP) is a promising proxy measure of synaptic plasticity in the cerebral cortex. However, existing studies are limited by small to moderate sample sizes as well as by considerable variability in how VEP modulation is quantified. In the present study, we used a large sample (n = 415) of healthy volunteers to compare different quantifications of VEP modulation with regards to effect sizes and retention of the modulation effect over time. We observed significant modulation for VEP components C1 (Cohen's d = 0.53), P1 (d = 0.66), N1 (d = -0.27), N1b (d = -0.66), but not P2 (p = 0.1), and in one time-frequency cluster (~30 Hz and ~70 ms post-stimulus; d = -0.48), 2-4 minutes after 2 Hz prolonged visual stimulation. For components N1 (d = -0.21) and N1b (d = -0.38), as well for the time-frequency cluster (d = -0.33), this effect was retained after 54-56 minutes. Moderate to high correlations (rho = [0.39, 0.69]) between modulation at different postintervention blocks revealed a relatively high temporal stability in the modulation effect for each VEP component. However, different VEP components also showed markedly different temporal retention patterns. Finally, P1 modulation correlated positively with age (t = 5.26), and was larger for female participants (t = 3.91), with no effects of either age or sex on N1 and N1b potentiation. These results provide strong support for VEP modulation, and especially N1b modulation, as a robust measure of synaptic plasticity, but underscore the need to differentiate between components, and to control for demographic confounders.
- Downloaded 244 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 70,175 out of 100,745
- In neuroscience: 12,379 out of 17,945
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 21,629 out of 100,745
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 43,266 out of 100,745
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 20 Oct 2020: Support for sorting preprints using Twitter activity has been removed, at least temporarily, until a new source of social media activity data becomes available.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!