Comparing serial X-ray crystallography and microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) as methods for routine structure determination from small macromolecular crystals
Alexander M Wolff,
Iris D Young,
Raymond G. Sierra,
Aaron S. Brewster,
Michael W. Martynowycz,
Justin T. Biel,
Aina E. Cohen,
Jake D Koralek,
Tomas S Lazarou,
Erin M Thompson,
Henry van den Bedem,
Rahel A. Woldeyes,
Nicholas K Sauter,
James S Fraser,
Michael C Thompson
Posted 12 Sep 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/767061 (published DOI: 10.1107/S205225252000072X)
Posted 12 Sep 2019
Innovative new crystallographic methods are facilitating structural studies from ever smaller crystals of biological macromolecules. In particular, serial X-ray crystallography and microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) have emerged as useful methods for obtaining structural information from crystals on the nanometer to micron scale. Despite the utility of these methods, their implementation can often be difficult, as they present many challenges not encountered in traditional macromolecular crystallography experiments. Here, we describe XFEL serial crystallography experiments and MicroED experiments using batch-grown microcrystals of the enzyme cyclophilin A (CypA). Our results provide a roadmap for researchers hoping to design macromolecular microcrystallography experiments, and they highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the two methods. Specifically, we focus on how the different physical conditions imposed by the sample preparation and delivery methods required for each type of experiment effect the crystal structure of the enzyme.
- Downloaded 884 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 13,779 out of 88,548
- In biophysics: 444 out of 3,846
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 20,493 out of 88,548
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 56,796 out of 88,548
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!