Rxivist logo

Early Tetrapodomorph Biogeography: Controlling for Fossil Record Bias in Macroevolutionary Analyses

By Jacob D. Gardner, Kevin Surya, Chris L. Organ

Posted 06 Aug 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/726786 (published DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2019.10.008)

The fossil record provides direct empirical data for understanding macroevolutionary patterns and processes. Inherent biases in the fossil record are well known to confound analyses of this data. Sampling bias proxies have been used as covariates in regression models to test for such biases. Proxies, such as formation count, are associated with paleobiodiversity, but are insufficient for explaining species dispersal owing to a lack of geographic context. Here, we develop a sampling bias proxy that incorporates geographic information and test it with a case study on early tetrapodomorph biogeography. We use recently-developed Bayesian phylogeographic models and a new supertree of early tetrapodomorphs to estimate dispersal rates and ancestral habitat locations. We find strong evidence that geographic sampling bias explains supposed radiations in dispersal rate (potential adaptive radiations). Our study highlights the necessity of accounting for geographic sampling bias in macroevolutionary and phylogenetic analyses and provides an approach to test for its effect.

Download data

  • Downloaded 687 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 48,792
    • In paleontology: 84
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 110,039
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 56,733

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide