Brain-age in midlife is associated with accelerated biological aging and cognitive decline in a longitudinal birth-cohort
Maxwell L Elliott,
Daniel W Belsky,
Annchen R. Knodt,
Tracy R. Melzer,
Terrie E. Moffitt,
Ahmad R Hariri
Posted 26 Jul 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/712851 (published DOI: 10.1038/s41380-019-0626-7)
Posted 26 Jul 2019
An individual's brain-age is the difference between chronological age and age predicted from machine-learning models of brain-imaging data. Brain-age has been proposed as a biomarker of age-related deterioration of the brain. Having an older brain-age has been linked to Alzheimer's, dementia and mortality. However, these findings are largely based on cross-sectional associations which can confuse age differences with cohort differences. To illuminate the validity of brain-age a biomarker of accelerated brain aging, a study is needed of a large cohort all born the same year who nevertheless vary on brain-age. In a population-representative 1972-73 birth cohort we measured brain-age at age 45, as well as the pace of biological aging and cognitive decline in longitudinal data from childhood to midlife (N=869). In this cohort, all chronological age 45 years, brain-age was measured reliably (ICC=.81) and ranged from 24 to 72 years. Those with older midlife brain-ages tended to have poorer cognitive function in both adulthood and childhood, as well as impaired brain health at age 3. Furthermore, those with older brain-ages had an accelerated pace of biological aging, older facial appearance and early signs of cognitive decline from childhood to midlife. These findings help to validate brain-age as a potential surrogate biomarker for midlife intervention studies that seek to measure treatment response to dementia-prevention efforts in midlife. However, the findings also caution against the assumption that brain-age scores represent only age-related deterioration of the brain as they may also index central nervous system variation present since childhood.
- Downloaded 507 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 52,002
- In neuroscience: 7,701
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 65,854
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 79,397
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!