Rxivist combines preprints from bioRxiv with data from Twitter to help you find the papers being discussed in your field. Currently indexing 67,450 bioRxiv papers from 297,377 authors.
DNA end-resection in highly accessible chromatin produces a toxic break
Jeroen van den Berg,
Stacey E.P. Joosten,
Anna G. Manjón,
Femke M. Feringa,
Bram van den Broek,
Posted 03 Jul 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/691857
Posted 03 Jul 2019
Of all damage occurring to DNA, the double strand break (DSB) is the most toxic lesion. Luckily, cells have developed multiple repair pathways to cope with these lesions. These different pathways compete for the same break, and the location of the break can influence this competition. However, the exact contribution of break location in repair pathway preference is not fully understood. We observe that most breaks prefer classical non-homologous end-joining, whereas some depend on DNA end-resection for their repair. Surprisingly, we find that for a subset of these sites, the activation of resection-dependent repair induces a detrimental DNA damage response. These sites exhibit extensive DNA end-resection due to improper recruitment of 53BP1 and the Shieldin complex due to low levels of H4K20me2. Most of these sites reside in close proximity to DNAseI hypersensitive sites. Compacting or removing these regions reduces extensive DNA end-resection and restores normal repair. Taken together, we found that DSB in open chromatin is highly toxic, due to the improper activity of 53BP1 and Shieldin, resulting in extensive DNA end-resection.
- Downloaded 554 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 18,668 out of 67,459
- In cell biology: 796 out of 3,280
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 5,520 out of 67,459
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 9,458 out of 67,459
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- Top preprints of 2018
- Paper search
- Author leaderboards
- Overall metrics
- The API
- Email newsletter
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!