Agreement between two large pan-cancer CRISPR-Cas9 gene dependency datasets
Joshua M Dempster,
Fiona M Behan,
Charlotte M Beaver,
Scott T Younger,
John G. Doench,
Jesse S. Boehm,
William C. Hahn,
David E Root,
Mathew J Garnett,
Posted 10 Apr 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/604447 (published DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13805-y)
Posted 10 Apr 2019
Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 viability screens performed in cancer cell lines provide a systematic approach to identify cancer dependencies and new therapeutic targets. As multiple large-scale screens become available, a formal assessment of the reproducibility of these experiments becomes necessary. We analyzed data from recently published pan-cancer CRISPR-Cas9 screens performed at the Broad and Sanger institutes. Despite significant differences in experimental protocols and reagents, we found that the screen results are highly concordant across multiple metrics with both common and specific dependencies jointly identified across the two studies. Furthermore, robust biomarkers of gene dependency found in one dataset are recovered in the other. Through further analysis and replication experiments at each institute, we found that batch effects are driven principally by two key experimental parameters: the reagent library and the assay length. These results indicate that the Broad and Sanger CRISPR-Cas9 viability screens yield robust and reproducible findings.
- Downloaded 1,906 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 4,200 out of 94,912
- In cancer biology: 95 out of 3,367
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 18,690 out of 94,912
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 20,332 out of 94,912
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!