Characterising the loss-of-function impact of 5’ untranslated region variants in 15,708 individuals
Miriam J Smith,
D Gareth Evans,
Angharad M. Roberts,
Nicholas M Quaife,
Owen J.L. Rackham,
Anne H. O’Donnell-Luria,
Laurent C Francioli,
Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) Production Team,
Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) Consortium,
Stuart A. Cook,
Paul JR Barton,
Daniel G MacArthur,
James S Ware
Posted 07 Feb 2019
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/543504 (published DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10717-9)
Posted 07 Feb 2019
Upstream open reading frames (uORFs) are important tissue-specific cis -regulators of protein translation. Although isolated case reports have shown that variants that create or disrupt uORFs can cause disease, genetic sequencing approaches typically focus on protein-coding regions and ignore these variants. Here, we describe a systematic genome-wide study of variants that create and disrupt human uORFs, and explore their role in human disease using 15,708 whole genome sequences collected by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) project. We show that 14,897 variants that create new start codons upstream of the canonical coding sequence (CDS), and 2,406 variants disrupting the stop site of existing uORFs, are under strong negative selection. Furthermore, variants creating uORFs that overlap the CDS show signals of selection equivalent to coding missense variants, and uORF-perturbing variants are under strong selection when arising upstream of known disease genes and genes intolerant to loss-of-function variants. Finally, we identify specific genes where perturbation of uORFs is likely to represent an important disease mechanism, and report a novel uORF frameshift variant upstream of NF2 in families with neurofibromatosis. Our results highlight uORF-perturbing variants as an important and under-recognised functional class that can contribute to penetrant human disease, and demonstrate the power of large-scale population sequencing data to study the deleteriousness of specific classes of non-coding variants.
- Downloaded 3,055 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 3,283 out of 119,004
- In genomics: 404 out of 6,455
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 10,243 out of 119,004
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 31,609 out of 119,004
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!