Bracketing phenotypic limits of mammalian hybridization
Teemu J. Häkkinen,
Ian J. Corfe,
Posted 29 Apr 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/310789 (published DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180903)
Posted 29 Apr 2018
An increasing number of mammalian species have been shown to have a history of hybridization and introgression based on genetic analyses. Only relatively few fossils, however, preserve genetic material and morphology must be used to identify the species and determine whether morphologically intermediate fossils could represent hybrids. Because dental and cranial fossils are typically the key body parts studied in mammalian paleontology, here we bracket the potential for phenotypically extreme hybridizations by examining uniquely preserved cranio-dental material of a captive hybrid between gray and ringed seals. We analyzed how distinct these species are genetically and morphologically, how easy it is to identify the hybrids using morphology, and whether comparable hybridizations happen in the wild. We show that the genetic distance between these species is more than twice the modern human-Neanderthal distance, but still within that of morphologically similar species-pairs known to hybridize. In contrast, morphological and developmental analyses show gray and ringed seals to be highly disparate, and that the hybrid is a predictable intermediate. Genetic analyses of the parent populations reveal introgression in the wild, suggesting that gray-ringed seal hybridization is not limited to captivity. Taken together, gray and ringed seals appear to be in an adaptive radiation phase of evolution, showing large morphological differences relative to their comparatively modest genetic distance. Because morphological similarity does not always correlate with genetic distance in nature, we postulate that there is considerable potential for mammalian hybridization between phenotypically disparate taxa.
- Downloaded 742 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 44,092
- In evolutionary biology: 2,034
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 143,821
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 136,999
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!