Signals of polygenic adaptation on height have been overestimated due to uncorrected population structure in genome-wide association studies
Robert M. Maier,
Alicia R. Martin,
Michael C. Turchin,
Charleston W. K. Chiang,
Joel N. Hirschhorn,
Benjamin M Neale,
Shamil R. Sunyaev
Posted 25 Jun 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/355057 (published DOI: 10.7554/eLife.39702)
Posted 25 Jun 2018
Genetic predictions of height differ among human populations and these differences are too large to be explained by genetic drift. This observation has been interpreted as evidence of polygenic adaptation. Differences across populations were detected using SNPs genome-wide significantly associated with height, and many studies also found that the signals grew stronger when large numbers of sub-significant SNPs were analyzed. This has led to excitement about the prospect of analyzing large fractions of the genome to detect subtle signals of selection and claims of polygenic adaptation for multiple traits. Polygenic adaptation studies of height have been based on SNP effect size measurements in the GIANT Consortium meta-analysis. Here we repeat the height analyses in the UK Biobank, a much more homogeneously designed study. Our results show that polygenic adaptation signals based on large numbers of SNPs below genome-wide significance are extremely sensitive to biases due to uncorrected population structure.
- Downloaded 2,857 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 3,560 out of 117,931
- In evolutionary biology: 78 out of 6,171
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 34,680 out of 117,931
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 31,363 out of 117,931
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!