Single cell expression analysis uncouples transdifferentiation and reprogramming
Bruno Di Stefano,
Marisa de Andres,
Maria Mendez Lago,
Ivo Glynne Gut,
Posted 20 Jun 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/351957 (published DOI: 10.7554/eLife.41627)
Posted 20 Jun 2018
Many somatic cell types are plastic, having the capacity to convert into other specialized cells (transdifferentiation)(1) or into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs, reprogramming)(2) in response to transcription factor over-expression. To explore what makes a cell plastic and whether these different cell conversion processes are coupled, we exposed bone marrow derived pre-B cells to two different transcription factor overexpression protocols that efficiently convert them either into macrophages or iPSCs and monitored the two processes over time using single cell gene expression analysis. We found that even in these highly efficient cell fate conversion systems, cells differ in both their speed and path of transdifferentiation and reprogramming. This heterogeneity originates in two starting pre-B cell subpopulations, large pre-BII and the small pre-BII cells they normally differentiate into. The large cells transdifferentiate slowly but exhibit a high efficiency of iPSC reprogramming. In contrast, the small cells transdifferentiate rapidly but are highly resistant to reprogramming. Moreover, the large B cells induce a stronger transient granulocyte/macrophage progenitor (GMP)-like state, while the small B cells undergo a more direct conversion to the macrophage fate. The large cells are cycling and exhibit high Myc activity whereas the small cells are Myc low and mostly quiescent. The observed heterogeneity of the two cell conversion processes can therefore be traced to two closely related cell types in the starting population that exhibit different types of plasticity. These data show that a somatic cell's propensity for either transdifferentiation and reprogramming can be uncoupled.
- Downloaded 984 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 13,787 out of 101,137
- In developmental biology: 305 out of 3,021
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 60,959 out of 101,137
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 73,091 out of 101,137
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 20 Oct 2020: Support for sorting preprints using Twitter activity has been removed, at least temporarily, until a new source of social media activity data becomes available.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!