Comprehensive cross-population analysis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer supports no more than three subtypes
Gregory P. Way,
Brooke L. Fridley,
Ellen L Goode,
Casey S. Greene,
Jennifer A Doherty
Posted 30 Oct 2015
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/030239 (published DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.033514)
Posted 30 Oct 2015
Four gene expression subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) have been previously described. In these studies, a fraction of samples that did not fit well into the four subtype classifications were excluded. Therefore, we sought to systematically determine the concordance of transcriptomic HGSC subtypes across populations without removing any samples. We created a bioinformatics pipeline to independently cluster the five largest mRNA expression datasets using k-means and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). We summarized differential expression patterns to compare clusters across studies. While previous studies reported four subtypes, our cross-population comparison does not support four. Because these results contrast with previous reports, we attempted to reproduce analyses performed in those studies. Our results suggest that early results favoring four subtypes may have been driven by including serous borderline tumors. In summary, our analysis suggests that either two or three, but not four, gene expression subtypes are most consistent across datasets.
- Downloaded 1,344 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 8,268 out of 101,433
- In cancer biology: 222 out of 3,642
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 43,538 out of 101,433
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 47,520 out of 101,433
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 20 Oct 2020: Support for sorting preprints using Twitter activity has been removed, at least temporarily, until a new source of social media activity data becomes available.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!