Bias toward long gene misregulation in synaptic disorders can be an artefact of amplification-based methods
By
Ayush T Raman,
Amy E Pohodich,
Ying-Wooi Wan,
Hari Krishna Yalamanchili,
Bill Lowry,
Huda Y. Zoghbi,
zhandong liu
Posted 29 Dec 2017
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/240705
(published DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05627-1)
Several recent studies have suggested that genes that are longer than 100 kilobases are more likely to be misregulated in neurological diseases associated with synaptic dysfunction, such as autism and Rett syndrome. These length-dependent transcriptional changes are modest in Mecp2-mutant samples, but, given the low sensitivity of high-throughput transcriptome profiling technology, the statistical significance of these results needs to be re-evaluated. Here, we show that the apparent length dependent trends previously observed in MeCP2 microarray and RNA-Sequencing datasets, particularly in genes with low fold-changes, disappeared after accounting for baseline variability estimated from randomized control samples. As we found no similar bias with NanoString technology, this long-gene bias seems to be particular to PCR amplification-based platforms. In contrast, authentic long gene effects, such as those caused by topoisomerase inhibition, can be detected even after adjustment for baseline variability. Accurate detection of length-dependent trends requires establishing a baseline from randomized control samples.
Download data
- Downloaded 775 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 28,197
- In neuroscience: 3,833
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 94,397
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 96,276
Altmetric data
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
PanLingua
News
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!