The impact of high frequency rapid viral antigen screening on COVID-19 spread and outcomes: a validation and modeling study
By
Beatrice Nash,
Anthony Badea,
Ankita Reddy,
Miguel Bosch,
Nol Salcedo,
Adam R. Gomez,
Alice Versiani,
Gislaine Celestino Dutra,
Thayza Maria Izabel Lopes dos Santos,
Bruno H. G. A. Milhim,
Marilia M Moraes,
Guilherme Rodrigues Fernandes Campos,
Flávia Quieroz,
Andreia Francesli Negri Reis,
Mauricio L Nogueira,
Elena N. Naumova,
Irene Bosch,
Bobby Brooke Herrera
Posted 03 Sep 2020
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.01.20184713
High frequency screening of populations has been proposed as a strategy in facilitating control of the COVID-19 pandemic. We use computational modeling, coupled with clinical data from rapid antigen tests, to predict the impact of frequent viral antigen rapid testing on COVID-19 spread and outcomes. Using patient nasal or nasopharyngeal swab specimens, we demonstrate that the sensitivity/specificity of two rapid antigen tests compared to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) are 82.0%/100% and 84.7%/85.7%, respectively; moreover, sensitivity correlates directly with viral load. Based on COVID-19 data from three regions in the United States and Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil, we show that high frequency, strategic population-wide rapid testing, even at varied accuracy levels, diminishes COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths at a fraction of the cost of nucleic acid detection via qRT-PCR. We propose large-scale antigen-based surveillance as a viable strategy to control SARS-CoV-2 spread and to enable societal re-opening.
Download data
- Downloaded 12,319 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 608
- In epidemiology: 84
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 70
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 17
Altmetric data
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
PanLingua
News
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!