Probability-based approaches for identifying low-titer antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2
By
Xaquin Castro Dopico,
Leo Hanke,
Daniel J Sheward,
Sandra Muschiol,
Soo Aleman,
Nastasiya F. Grinberg,
Monika Adori,
Murray Christian,
Laura Perez Vidakovics,
Changil Kim,
Sharesta Khoenkhoen,
Pradeepa Pushparaj,
Ainhoa Moliner Morro,
Marco Mandolesi,
Marcus Ahl,
Mattias Forsell,
Jonathan M Coquet,
Martin Corcoran,
Joanna Rorbach,
Joakim Dillner,
Gordana Bogdanovic,
Gerald M. Mcinerney,
Tobias Allander,
Ben Murrell,
Chris Wallace,
Jan Albert,
Gunilla B. Karlsson Hedestam
Posted 17 Jul 2020
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.17.20155937
The levels of the antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 varies widely between individuals, which together with the decline of antibody responses over time, complicates the correct classification of seropositivity using conventional assay cut-offs. All subjects in a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 PCR+ individuals representing different disease severity categories (n=105), and a group of PCR+ hospital staff (n=33), developed IgG against pre-fusion-stabilized spike (S) trimers and 97% did against the receptor-binding domain (RBD). The levels differed by several orders of magnitude and associated with disease phenotype. Concomitant analysis of a cohort of healthy blood donors and pregnant women (n=1,000), representing individuals who had undergone milder infections, demonstrated highly variable IgG titers, including several that scored between the classical 3SD and 6SD cut-offs. Since the correct classification of seropositivity is critical for epidemiological estimates, we trained probabilistic algorithms to assign likelihood of past infection using anti-S and -RBD IgG data from PCR+ individuals and a large cohort of historical negative controls (n=595). Applied to blood donors and pregnant women, this probabilistic approach provided a more accurate way to interpret antibody titers spread over a large continuum offering a probability-based diagnosis. The methods described here are directly applicable to serological measurements following natural infection and vaccination.
Download data
- Downloaded 1,525 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 10,413
- In allergy and immunology: 30
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 4,877
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 4,877
Altmetric data
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
PanLingua
News
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!